Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0356919950290060824
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
1995 Volume.29 No. 6 p.824 ~ p.829
Effect of Alternative Methods on Pain during Intravenous Administration of Propofol
±è½ÂÀÏ
±è°Ç½Ä/±èµ¿¿í/½Å¿Á¿µ/±Ç¹«ÀÏ
Abstract
Propofol is limited in clinical use for induction of anesthesia, because of its high incidence of pain on injection. We sought to determine whether different methods could prevent this pain. 150 patients were allocated randomly into five groups.
Group 1
was received room-air temperature propofol 2.5 mg/kg. Group 2 was received room-air temperature propofol 2.5 mg/kg mixed with 1 ml of 1%(10 mg) lidocaine. Group 3 was received room-air temperature propofol 2.5 mg/kg mixed with ml of 1%(10 mg)
lidocaine.
Group 4 was received room-air temperature propofol 2.5 mg/kg mixed with 1 ml of 0.5%(5 mg) lidocaine.
Group 5 was received propofol 2.5 mg/kg cooled to 0¡­4¡É. The pain was classified as none, mild, moderate, or severe. All patients were questioned the degree of pain in an identical manner both at induction of anesthesia and as recalled in the
recovery
room.
There was a significant reduction in the incidnce and severity of pain in the Groups 2 and 3, which were used 10 mg of lidocaine. But 23.3% of patients in the Group 2 and 30.0% of patients in the Group 3 still suffered unpleasant pain during the
induction, and 20.0% and 26.7% of patients, respectively recalled in the recovery room.
From the above results, we concluded that the pain from injection of propofol can be prevented by 1 ml of 1%(10 mg) lidocaine mixed with propofol of preinjection before propofol(Korean J Anesthesiol 1995; 29: 824¡­829)
KEYWORD
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø